Zen: A Direct Path of Enlightenment

It’s the mind that inspires the artist, the poet, the inventor, and the mystic. It’s the field of thought that is beyond picking and choosing.

 

By Daniel Scharpenburg

What makes Zen different from other branches of Buddhism?

It’s sometimes hard to say, but there’s a sense of directness in Zen. Enlightenment is thought of as something remote in other branches of Buddhism, only to be attained after many lifetimes of strenuous effort. But in the Zen tradition, we think of Enlightenment as something normal and natural. It’s our true nature, something that can come to us at any moment.

Zen also teaches in a very direct and simple way; it points directly to Enlightenment. The Lankavatara Sutra, a foundational Zen text, talks about a turning about of the mind wherein our dualistic views are transcended—this is enlightenment.

In this state the mind is like a clear mirror, reflecting whatever appears exactly as it is, without obscuration. This is further described in a group of texts called the Prajnaparamita Sutras as, “No attainment with nothing to attain.” Enlightenment is already ours, one only has to see it, to notice it in the present moment.

Zen awareness is about dwelling in non-duality. Our typical streams of thought are usually rooted in duality. Zen training focuses on our intuitive mind rather than our rational one. Reasoning can take us very far. We can have the doctrine of Emptiness explained to us at length, and we can memorize sutras, but unless we step outside of the delusions we’re carrying we will have difficulty grasping it intuitively.

Our reasoning mind looks for things like “true” and “false.” Zen awareness is dwelling in a state that’s beyond that. Not true, not false, but also not both and not neither. That’s why Zen concepts are sometimes explored through paradox. The reasoning mind can’t handle paradox, so the intuitive mind has to push through.

The reasoning mind works entirely by discriminating, analyzing, and comparing. We are trying to come to a state of awareness beyond all of that, which we sometimes call Satori.

The awareness we are seeking is Prajnaparamita, the wisdom that is beyond. To get there, we have to turn our minds to dwell in the void of emptiness. The intuitive mind is something that we all have but very few of us can actually use it at will, and fewer still can use it at will all the time. We can only develop it by practicing its use.

It’s the mind that inspires the artist, the poet, the inventor, and the mystic. It’s the field of thought that is beyond picking and choosing. Satori is a flash of intuitive awareness. It’s deep and profound enough to break through the layers of delusion and let the truth of emptiness flow into our being. It’s challenging to describe because it’s an intuitive knowing that is beyond all concepts and labels.

Part of our problem is our own intellect. The power of our minds enable us to create labels and symbols for things that seem separate. We create artificial labels for everything, and then we act as though those labels are real and natural. Money, for example, is just a piece of paper. But we add meaning to it because we are told that we are supposed to.

Because the labels are easier to understand than reality, they are more stable and seem permanent. We have this sense of “self” that has an identity and a mind, that engages the world. But self is a label too, an artificial construct. With its direct emphasis, Zen points this out to us. The self we perceive ourselves to be isn’t our real nature. We might have a sort of internal conflict when we come to realize the difference between who we are and who we think we are.

When we don’t identify with the label of “I-Me-Mine” then our entire relationship with the world changes. Our relationship with the world becomes more intimate, authentic and real. The knower isn’t so separate from the known. When we have experiences, we can have them fully, rather than feeling separate from what’s happening.

It becomes clear that I am not separate from the entire totality of things. I am not part of the universe, the whole universe is contained within me.

This was described in Huayan Buddhism as an infinite net of jewels. Every jewel reflects all of the other jewels. Everything that is, is reflected in me.

Practice and enlightenment are not separate, that there’s no distinction between enlightenment and striving for enlightenment. We might think that we are practicing with the goal of attaining enlightenment, but it’s said the practice itself is enlightenment.

There is no separation between the path and the goal. Dwelling in this present moment, the eternal now, is enlightenment. One doesn’t practice to become a Buddha. One practices because one is a Buddha already.

 

Photo: (source 1, 2, 3)

Editor: John Author

Comments

comments

Daniel Scharpenburg

Daniel Scharpenburg is an independent dharma teacher in Kansas City. He regularly gives teachings through the Open Heart Project, the largest virtual mindfulness community in the world.

He was trained and certified as a meditation teacher at the Rime Buddhist Center, where he also spent four years teaching kids about Buddhism and meditation practice. He received additional training in the Zen tradition, both as a Monk in the Korean Zen tradition and as a lay teacher in the Caodong Chan tradition.

He has taken Bodhisattva Vows and the precepts of a lay zen teacher.

His work is dedicated to both sharing his own story and presenting a variety of Buddhist teachings in a way that shows how they are applicable to real life.

Find out more about Daniel on his blog and connect with him on Facebook, Youtube,andTwitter

Latest posts by Daniel Scharpenburg (see all)

By | 2017-03-23T07:17:44+00:00 March 23rd, 2017|blog, Buddhism, Featured, Striding Through The Universe|1 Comment

One Comment


  1. Notice: Trying to get property of non-object in /home/buddha1/public_html/wp-content/plugins/easy-author-image/easy-author-image.php on line 209
    pcuzco7@gmail.com'
    Pablo Cuzco March 23, 2017 at 3:52 pm - Reply

    I appreciate your insights, Daniel. They break from the tradition of the Buddhist acolytes who sit on meditation mats chanting “AOM” till their heads spin.

    Rarely sitting, breathing or even chanting, I’ve come to know the enlightenment you describe. 20 years ago I took a course in college on Zen Meditation. Previous to that I was always interested in the principles of meditation through the writings of authors like Hesse, Huxley, Kerouac, and the Beat Poets. In the early 70s, I traveled across the country with nothing but a backpack and a few dollars in my pocket, hopping boxcars and hitchhiking wherever the road or the rails would take me. I gained enlightenment. But, without association in a Buddhist sect, I’m at a loss as to what to call my states of Satori. Zen? Buddhism? Mindfulness? As you say, these are merely labels.

    The intuitive enlightenment you mention is the Buddha nature in all of us. We see it in the baseball pitcher who dusts his shoes with his glove then sends a beautiful curve ball across the plate; the housewife who scrubs the floor while humming in contentment; the taxi driver, cutting through impossible traffic and telling his story without missing a turn, smiling and tooting his horn.

    Your articles put into words what it’s taken me a lifetime of trial and error to achieve. So, please keep sharing this unique insight, a beacon to those who walk in the path of the rogue Buddhist masters – what did you call one in an earlier post, the Drunken Buddhist? As you can see, I know nothing of tradition or sacred texts. I just happily meditate my way through life.

Leave A Comment